Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fringe science theories are often advanced by people who have no traditional academic science background, or by researchers outside the mainstream discipline. [ 2 ] : 58 [ 3 ] The general public has difficulty distinguishing between science and its imitators, [ 2 ] : 173 and in some cases, a "yearning to believe or a generalized suspicion of ...
A fringe theory is an idea or a viewpoint that differs significantly from the accepted scholarship of the time within its field. Fringe theories include the models and proposals of fringe science, as well as similar ideas in other areas of scholarship, such as the humanities.
A fringe theory is an idea or a collection of ideas that departs significantly from the prevailing or mainstream view. It can include work done to the appropriate level of scholarship in a field of study but only supported by a minority of practitioners, to more dubious work.
About Category:Fringe science and related categories: This category's scope contains articles about Fringe science, which may be a contentious label
For example, fringe theories in science depart significantly from mainstream science and have little or no scientific support. [3] Other examples include conspiracy theories and esoteric claims about medicine. Scholarly opinion is generally the most authoritative source to identify the mainstream view.
Christian Science is generally considered a Christian new religious movement; however, some have called it "pseudoscience" because its founder, Mary Baker Eddy, used "science" in its name, and because of its former stance against medical science. Also, "Eddy used the term Metaphysical science to distinguish her system both from materialistic ...
A fringe theory is an idea or a viewpoint that differs significantly from the accepted scholarship of the time within its field. Fringe theories include the models and proposals of fringe science , as well as similar ideas in other areas of scholarship, such as the humanities .
Similarly, the border between the lower end of fringe science and the upper end of pseudoscience is hard to distinguish. Some fringe theories were taken seriously as alternative mainstream theories for at least a little while, and were then rejected. Plasma cosmology would be an example. The original version of this was posted here