enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sentence (mathematical logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentence_(mathematical_logic)

    For real numbers, this formula is true if we substitute (arbitrarily) =, but is false if = It is the presence of a free variable, rather than the inconstant truth value, that is important; for example, even for complex numbers, where the formula is always true, it is still not considered a sentence.

  3. Extension by new constant and function names - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extension_by_new_constant...

    Shoenfield states the theorem in the form for a new function name, and constants are the same as functions of zero arguments. In formal systems that admit ordered tuples, extension by multiple constants as shown here can be accomplished by addition of a new constant tuple and the new constant names having the values of elements of the tuple.

  4. Absoluteness (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absoluteness_(logic)

    In mathematical logic, a formula is said to be absolute to some class of structures (also called models), if it has the same truth value in each of the members of that class. One can also speak of absoluteness of a formula between two structures, if it is absolute to some class which contains both of them.

  5. Plot twist: Miami Dolphins subsidiary helped pay for Mayor ...

    www.aol.com/one-mystery-solved-dolphins...

    A company tied to the Miami Dolphins and team owner Stephen Ross, a South Florida billionaire with business before the city of Miami, gave Miami Mayor Francis Suarez a $3,500 Formula 1 ticket in ...

  6. Reverse mathematics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_mathematics

    A typical reverse mathematics theorem shows that a particular mathematical theorem T is equivalent to a particular subsystem S of second-order arithmetic over a weaker subsystem B. This weaker system B is known as the base system for the result; in order for the reverse mathematics result to have meaning, this system must not itself be able to ...

  7. Peirce's law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peirce's_law

    With Peirce's law, one can add (at no cost) additional premises of the form Z→P to Γ. For example, suppose we are given P→Z and (P→Q)→Z and we wish to deduce Z so that we can use the deduction theorem to conclude that (P→Z)→(((P→Q)→Z)→Z) is a theorem. Then we can add another premise Z→Q.

  8. Summation by parts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summation_by_parts

    The formula for an integration by parts is () ′ = [() ()] ′ (). Beside the boundary conditions , we notice that the first integral contains two multiplied functions, one which is integrated in the final integral ( g ′ {\displaystyle g'} becomes g {\displaystyle g} ) and one which is differentiated ( f {\displaystyle f} becomes f ...

  9. Axiom schema - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_schema

    An axiom schema is a formula in the metalanguage of an axiomatic system, in which one or more schematic variables appear. These variables, which are metalinguistic constructs, stand for any term or subformula of the system, which may or may not be required to satisfy certain conditions.