Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In its first year, the Corporate Equality Index awarded its 100 percent rating to 13 businesses. [8] Each year, there has been an increase in the number of businesses that achieve this rating. In the 2011 index, 337 companies received the 100 percent rating. [9] The criteria for the index has changed since its first publication.
A number of prominent companies have scaled back or set aside the diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives that much of corporate America endorsed following the protests that accompanied the ...
According to the University of Iowa DEI framework, "equity is different than equality in that equality implies treating everyone as if their experiences are exactly the same." [135] A common identification, especially among critics, is of equality as meaning "equality of opportunities" and equity as "equality of outcome".
Hilton has scored 100% on the Corporate Equality Index each year from 2014 to 2017. [84] In 2016, Hilton was named one of the "World's 25 Best Multinational Workplaces" by Fortune and Great Place to Work. [85] [86] [87] In 2017, Fortune ranked Hilton number 26 in their list of "The 100 Best Companies to Work For".
Moody's Receives Top Corporate Equality Index Ranking NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Moody's Corporation (NYSE-MCO) announced today that it has received a 100 percent ranking, the highest possible ...
Ford, in previous years, had received a perfect score on the index. In a statement, Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson said the group was disappointed in Ford's decision.
Meijer scored 0% on the 2008 Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index, which is a measure of how U.S. companies and businesses are treating gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender employees, consumers and investors. Meijer was one of only three companies out of over 500 graded to receive a score of 0. [77]
Stella Mae Pettway, who has sold her quilts on Etsy for $100 to $8,000, has characterized having scissors and access to more fabrics now as a paradox of “advantage and a disadvantage.”