Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The corresponding logical symbols are "", "", [6] and , [10] and sometimes "iff".These are usually treated as equivalent. However, some texts of mathematical logic (particularly those on first-order logic, rather than propositional logic) make a distinction between these, in which the first, ↔, is used as a symbol in logic formulas, while ⇔ is used in reasoning about those logic formulas ...
is true only if both A and B are false, or both A and B are true. Whether a symbol means a material biconditional or a logical equivalence , depends on the author’s style. x + 5 = y + 2 ⇔ x + 3 = y {\displaystyle x+5=y+2\Leftrightarrow x+3=y}
Venn diagram of (true part in red) In logic and mathematics, the logical biconditional, also known as material biconditional or equivalence or biimplication or bientailment, is the logical connective used to conjoin two statements and to form the statement "if and only if" (often abbreviated as "iff " [1]), where is known as the antecedent, and the consequent.
In other words, the antecedent S cannot be true without N being true. For example, in order for someone to be called S ocrates, it is necessary for that someone to be N amed. Similarly, in order for human beings to live, it is necessary that they have air.
The and of a set of operands is true if and only if all of its operands are true, i.e., is true if and only if is true and is true. An operand of a conjunction is a conjunct. [3] Beyond logic, the term "conjunction" also refers to similar concepts in other fields:
In other words, it’s the perfect month for anyone who loves Netflix, and this year that doesn’t just include catching up on a show. Starting today, the new Netflix Bites Vegas is open at the ...
Musk believes some $1 billion per week is being spent on fraudulent Treasury payments, prompting Trump to ask if this could help national debt.
Also, the section "Distinction from 'if' and 'only if'" is valiant but ultimately unsuccessful. As proved by the comments above, the meanings of "if" and of "only if" in common English are inconsistent and malleable, so trying to use ordinary sentences to explain the mathematical meanings of those words is doomed from the start.