Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The plaintiff filed a claim in trespass to the person, because the claim in negligence was time-barred. Trespass to the person is a tort involving wrongful direct interference with another person and traditionally included both intentional and negligent acts.
Winterbottom sought to extend the ratio of the court in Langridge v Levy [5] but the court rejected that on the grounds that that case involved a gun whose safety had been misrepresented by the vendor. [2] The case was also possibly influenced by public policy. If the plaintiff were able to sue," there would be unlimited actions" and the public ...
Decided November 17, 1948; Full case name: Charles A. Summers v. Howard W. Tice, et al. Citation(s) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1: Holding; When a plaintiff suffers a single indivisible injury, for which the negligence of each of several potential tortfeasors could have been a but-for cause, but only one of which could have actually been the cause, all the potential tortfeasors are jointly and ...
[5] the prosecutor who tried the case filed for his release under a nolle prosse of the case. [4] The former prosecutor is now representing Ripan in the claim against the state. [4] A bill in the 1939 Legislature was introduced to compensate him for the 13 years but it did not pass. After a hearing in the court of claims, Mr. Ripan was denied ...
Case law of United States courts related to the tort of negligence. Pages in category "United States negligence case law" The following 18 pages are in this category, out of 18 total.
such negligence caused damage to plaintiff in that the relationship was actually interfered with or disrupted and plaintiff lost in whole or in part the economic benefits or advantage reasonably expected from the relationship. [13] Some cases add that a defendant acts negligently only if the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty of care. [14]
In a 4-3 majority decision by Associate Justice Stanley Mosk, the court decided to impose a new kind of liability, known as market share liability.The doctrine evolved from a line of negligence and strict products liability opinions (most of which had been decided by the Supreme Court of California) that were being adopted as the majority rule in many U.S. states.
In Michigan, the Circuit Court is the trial court with the broadest powers in Michigan. In general, the Circuit Court handles all civil cases with claims of more than $25,000 and all felony criminal cases (cases where the accused, if found guilty, could be sent to prison).