enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Historical_Account_of...

    [1] Newton's work also built upon the textual work of Richard Simon and his own research. The text was first published in English in 1754, 27 years after his death. The account claimed to review the textual evidence available [2] from ancient sources on two disputed Bible passages: 1 John 5:7 and 1 Timothy 3:16.

  3. Criticism of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible

    Specific collections of biblical writings, such as the Hebrew Bible and Christian Bibles, are considered sacred and authoritative by their respective faith groups. [11] The limits of the canon were effectively set by the proto-orthodox churches from the 1st throughout the 4th century; however, the status of the scriptures has been a topic of scholarly discussion in the later churches.

  4. List of New Testament verses not included in modern English ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament...

    An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture by Sir Isaac Newton (published posthumously 1785); Letters to Mr. Archdeacon [George] Travis in answer to his Defence of the Three Heavenly Witnesses by Richard Porson (1790, London); A New Plea for the Authenticity of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses or Porson's Letters to ...

  5. Talk : An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:An_Historical_Account...

    I cleaned up a few errors and questionable statements in the Timothy section. I agree that the article could use a lot of improvement. On the Comma Johanneum page, there is a section "Other disputed New Testament passages". Probably 1 Timothy 3:16 would best have its own page, separate from the "Notable Corruption" page.

  6. Misquoting Jesus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misquoting_Jesus

    Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (published as Whose Word Is It? in the United Kingdom) is a book by Bart D. Ehrman, a New Testament scholar at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. [1] Published in 2005 by HarperCollins, the book introduces lay readers to the field of textual criticism of the Bible.

  7. Source criticism (biblical studies) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism_(biblical...

    Source criticism, in biblical criticism, refers to the attempt to establish the sources used by the authors and redactors of a biblical text. It originated in the 18th century with the work of Jean Astruc, who adapted the methods already developed for investigating the texts of classical antiquity (in particular, Homer's Iliad) to his own investigation into the sources of the Book of Genesis. [1]

  8. Tahrif - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tahrif

    The corruption of the Biblical text was elaborated more extensively by ibn Hazm in the 11th century, who popularized the concept of tahrif al-nass "corruption of the text". Ibn Hazm rejected claims of Mosaic authorship and posited that Ezra was the author of the Torah.

  9. Criticism of the Catholic Church - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Catholic...

    In his lecture, the Pope, speaking in German, quoted a passage about Islam made at the end of the 14th century by Byzantine (Eastern Roman) emperor Manuel II Palaiologos. As the English translation of the Pope's lecture was disseminated across the world, the quotation was taken out of context and many Islamic politicians and religious leaders ...

  1. Related searches two notable corruption of scripture writing ielts speaking part 1 questions

    two notable corruption of scripturehistory of corruption in the bible
    corruption in the new testament