enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Irreducible complexity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_complexity

    Irreducible complexity (IC) is the argument that certain biological systems with multiple interacting parts would not function if one of the parts were removed, so supposedly could not have evolved by successive small modifications from earlier less complex systems through natural selection, which would need all intermediate precursor systems to have been fully functional. [1]

  3. Darwin's Black Box - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin's_Black_Box

    Darwin's Black Box was not well received by the scientific community, which rejected Behe's premises and arguments. Kenneth Miller described Behe's argument as an updated version of the argument from design with reference to biochemistry (which was echoed by other reviewers), [10] [11] and also cites areas in biochemistry and the fossil record which demonstrate currently irreducibly complex ...

  4. Evolution of the eye - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye

    At a cellular level, there appear to be two main types of eyes, one possessed by the protostomes (molluscs, annelid worms and arthropods), the other by the deuterostomes (chordates and echinoderms). [24] The functional unit of the eye is the photoreceptor cell, which contains the opsin proteins and responds to light by initiating a nerve impulse.

  5. Michael Behe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe

    Irreducible complexity is a negative argument against evolution, not proof of design, a point conceded by defense expert Professor Minnich." [ 51 ] "Professor Behe's concept of irreducible complexity depends on ignoring ways in which evolution is known to occur.

  6. Alternatives to Darwinian evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_Darwinian...

    A species had an irreducible functional complexity, and "none of its parts can change without the others changing too". [11] Evolutionists expected one part to change at a time, one change to follow another. In Cuvier's view, evolution was impossible, as any one change would unbalance the whole delicate system. [11]

  7. Objections to evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_to_evolution

    Objections to evolution have been raised since evolutionary ideas came to prominence in the 19th century. When Charles Darwin published his 1859 book On the Origin of Species, his theory of evolution (the idea that species arose through descent with modification from a single common ancestor in a process driven by natural selection) initially met opposition from scientists with different ...

  8. Visual system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_system

    The visual system is the physiological basis of visual perception (the ability to detect and process light).The system detects, transduces and interprets information concerning light within the visible range to construct an image and build a mental model of the surrounding environment.

  9. David Snoke - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Snoke

    David W. Snoke is a Distinguished Professor [1] of Physics at the University of Pittsburgh and co-director of the Pittsburgh Quantum Institute.In 2006 he was elected a Fellow of the American Physical Society "for his pioneering work on the experimental and theoretical understanding of dynamical optical processes in semiconductor systems."