enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Associates...

    The court agreed with district court's refusal to follow the Whelan logic because the test is "conceptually overbroad." [ 1 ] A program can have multiple functions and thus many ideas. As an alternate metric, the court presented a three-step test to determine substantial similarity, abstraction-filtration-comparison .

  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celotex_Corp._v._Catrett

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.

  4. Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc...

    One might assume that the text of U.S. case law is in public domain, but Thomson West claimed a copyright as to the first-page citations and internal pinpoint page citations of its versions of court opinions (case law) found in its printed versions of the case law ("West's citation claims"). West also claimed a copyright in the text of its ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving standing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Held that state taxpayers do not have standing to challenge to state tax laws in federal court. 9–0 Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent ...

  6. Padilla v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padilla_v._Kentucky

    The case extended the Supreme Court's prior decisions on criminal defendants' Sixth Amendment right to counsel to immigration consequences. The duties of Counsel recognized in Padilla are broad. After Padilla, if the law is unambiguous, attorneys must advise their criminal clients that deportation will result from a conviction. Also, if the ...

  7. NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._J._Weingarten,_Inc.

    NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975), is a United States labor law case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.It held that employees in unionized workplaces have the right under the National Labor Relations Act to the presence of a union steward during any management inquiry that the employee reasonably believes may result in discipline.

  8. Here are 2022's top legal cases in business - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/2022s-top-legal-cases...

    Supreme Court curbs EPA authority. In another Supreme Court decision, the high court ruled in a 6-3 decision along ideological lines that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency cannot force ...

  9. BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_of_North_America,_Inc...

    The plaintiff, Dr. Ira Gore, bought a new BMW, and later discovered that the vehicle had been repainted before he bought it. Defendant BMW of North America revealed that their policy was to sell damaged cars as new if the damage could be fixed for less than 3% of the cost of the car. Dr. Gore sued, and an Alabama jury awarded $4,000 in compensatory damages (lost value of the car) and $4 ...