enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Judicial economy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_economy

    Judicial economy or procedural economy [1] [2] [3] is the principle that the limited resources of the legal system or a given court should be conserved by the refusal to decide one or more claims raised in a case.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving standing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Held that state taxpayers do not have standing to challenge to state tax laws in federal court. 9–0 Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent ...

  4. Gregory v. Helvering - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_v._Helvering

    Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court concerned with U.S. income tax law. [1] The case is cited as part of the basis for two legal doctrines: the business purpose doctrine and the doctrine of substance over form.

  5. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Film_Corp._v...

    Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling by a 9–0 vote that the free speech protection of the Ohio Constitution, which was substantially similar to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, did not extend to motion pictures.

  6. Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erznoznik_v._City_of...

    The Supreme Court issued a ruling invalidating the ordinance and held: (a) The ordinance by discriminating among movies solely on the basis of content has the effect of deterring drive-in theaters from showing movies containing any nudity, however innocent or even educational, and such censorship of the content of otherwise protected speech cannot be justified on the basis of the limited ...

  7. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Burstyn,_Inc._v._Wilson

    Case history; Prior: 278 A.D. 253, 104 N.Y.S.2d 740 (App. Div. 1951), affirmed, 303 N.Y. 242, 101 N.E.2d 665 (1951).Holding; Provisions of the New York Education Law that allow a censor to forbid the commercial showing of any non-licensed motion picture film, or revoke or deny the license of a film deemed to be "sacrilegious", were a "restraint on freedom of speech", and thereby a violation of ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com/?icid=aol.com-nav

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_City_Studios...

    The circuit court also considered Corley's fair use defense, as Corley argued that DeCSS allowed users to watch encrypted DVDs, which prior to that point had been impossible on Linux machines. The circuit court held that the specific facts of the present case were beyond the types of fair use that are permissible under the DMCA.