enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chief Justice Roberts warns of threats to judges in ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/chief-justice-roberts-warns...

    (The Center square) – U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts warned that judges across the country face increasing threats from disinformation, violence, intimidation and those ...

  3. Chief Justice John Roberts sounds alarm over potential ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/chief-justice-john-roberts...

    On the eve of a new year and a second Trump presidency, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a stark warning to the incoming administration, members of Congress and the public about threats to the ...

  4. EDITORIAL: Judicial discretion is vital for pretrial release ...

    www.aol.com/news/editorial-judicial-discretion...

    Mar. 4—When it comes down to who should stay in jail pending trial and who is safe to release, it is essential our judges are exercising judicial discretion. Because in three recent cases, the ...

  5. Threatening government officials of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_government...

    Threats against federal judges and prosecutors have more than doubled in recent years, with threats against federal prosecutors rising from 116 to 250 from 2003 to 2008, [50] and threats against federal judges climbing from 500 to 1,278 in that same period, [51] [52] prompting hundreds to get 24-hour protection from armed U.S. marshals.

  6. Miranda warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

    In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.

  7. Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial.

  8. Chief Justice John Roberts says judicial independence under ...

    www.aol.com/chief-justice-john-roberts-says...

    WASHINGTON — Chief Justice John Roberts issued a defense Tuesday of judicial independence, which he said is under threat from intimidation, disinformation and the prospect of public officials ...

  9. United States federal probation and supervised release

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal...

    It was also deemed desirable that supervised release revocations be subject to the same procedural safeguards as probation revocations. The Judicial Conference also opposed mandatory drug testing and mandatory revocation of probation and supervised release, [55] requirements imposed by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.