Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[8] [9] [verification needed] Cramer's rule can also be numerically unstable even for 2×2 systems. [10] However, Cramer's rule can be implemented with the same complexity as Gaussian elimination, [11] [12] (consistently requires twice as many arithmetic operations and has the same numerical stability when the same permutation matrices are ...
The number of distinct terms (including those with a zero coefficient) in an n-th degree equation in two variables is (n + 1)(n + 2) / 2.This is because the n-th degree terms are ,, …,, numbering n + 1 in total; the (n − 1) degree terms are ,, …,, numbering n in total; and so on through the first degree terms and , numbering 2 in total, and the single zero degree term (the constant).
The equations 3x + 2y = 6 and 3x + 2y = 12 are inconsistent. A linear system is inconsistent if it has no solution, and otherwise, it is said to be consistent. [7] When the system is inconsistent, it is possible to derive a contradiction from the equations, that may always be rewritten as the statement 0 = 1. For example, the equations
It may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. φ c 2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables. [citation needed] In the case of a 2 × 2 contingency table Cramér's V is equal to the absolute value of Phi coefficient.
Cramér’s decomposition theorem, a statement about the sum of normal distributed random variable; Cramér's theorem (large deviations), a fundamental result in the theory of large deviations; Cramer's theorem (algebraic curves), a result regarding the necessary number of points to determine a curve
The Möller–Trumbore ray-triangle intersection algorithm, named after its inventors Tomas Möller and Ben Trumbore, is a fast method for calculating the intersection of a ray and a triangle in three dimensions without needing precomputation of the plane equation of the plane containing the triangle. [1]
[2] [3] Cramer and Leonhard Euler corresponded on the paradox in letters of 1744 and 1745 and Euler explained the problem to Cramer. [4] It has become known as Cramer's paradox after featuring in his 1750 book Introduction à l'analyse des lignes courbes algébriques , although Cramer quoted Maclaurin as the source of the statement. [ 5 ]
If just 2% of our most loyal readers gave $2.75 today, we'd hit our goal in a few hours. Most readers don't donate, so if Wikipedia has given you $2.75 worth of knowledge, please give. Any contribution helps, whether it's $2.75 one time or monthly.