enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Perez v. Sharp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perez_v._Sharp

    Perez v. Sharp, [1] also known as Perez v. Lippold or Perez v.Moroney, is a 1948 case decided by the Supreme Court of California in which the court held by a 4–3 majority that the state's ban on interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  3. In re Marriage Cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Marriage_Cases

    In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757 (Cal. 2008) was a California Supreme Court case where the court held that laws treating classes of persons differently based on sexual orientation should be subject to strict judicial scrutiny, and that an existing statute and initiative measure limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples violate the rights of same-sex couples under the California ...

  4. Timeline of same-sex marriage in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_same-sex...

    June 26: The Supreme Court issues a 5–4 decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, dismissing the appeal of the district court's decision on August 4, 2010, when the case was known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger, that affirmed the right of same-sex couples to marry in California. [245] June 28: Following the Supreme Court's decision in Hollingsworth v.

  5. The Supreme Court rules against California woman whose ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-against...

    The Supreme Court on Friday ruled against a California woman who said her rights were violated after federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country, in part, because of the way ...

  6. 2000 California Proposition 22 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_California_Proposition_22

    In December 2006, the California Supreme Court voted unanimously to review all six cases and held oral argument on March 4, 2008, consolidating the cases as In re Marriage Cases. [24] The Court ruled on May 15, 2008, that Proposition 22 violated the state Constitution and was therefore invalid. [25]

  7. San Francisco 2004 same-sex weddings - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_2004_same...

    The line of same-sex couples applying for marriage licenses stretched for blocks around San Francisco's City Hall in February 2004. In the 2004 State of the Union Address, President George W. Bush spoke against "activist judges [...] redefining marriage by court order;" this was interpreted as a response to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's 2003 ruling legalizing same-sex marriage in ...

  8. Child marriage is still legal in California. How could this ...

    www.aol.com/child-marriage-still-legal...

    The world cannot keep its promise to end child marriage by year 2030 if California continues to hold up progress.

  9. Obergefell v. Hodges - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges

    List of LGBT-related cases in the United States Supreme Court; Goodridge v. Department of Public Health (2003), the court case that legalized same-sex marriage in Massachusetts (first state to do so in the U.S.) List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 576; Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States