Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
ResearchGate's competitors include Academia.edu, Google Scholar, and Mendeley, [4] as well as new competitors that emerged in the last decade like Semantic Scholar. In 2016, Academia.edu reportedly had more registered users (about 34 million versus 11 million [ 25 ] ) and higher web traffic, but ResearchGate was substantially larger in terms of ...
Internet Archive Scholar: Multidisciplinary: 25,000,000 Focus on fulltext search of open access journals and conference proceedings Free Yes Internet Archive: CORE [3] Multidisciplinary: 9,800,000 [4] (207,000,000 metadata [5]) A full text aggregator of all open access papers from repositories (institutional, subject, preprints, etc.) and ...
Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147–2164. Oltersdorf, J. (2013).
Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. . Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other ...
The i-10 index indicates the number of academic publications an author has written that have been cited by at least 10 sources. It was introduced in July 2011 by Google as part of their work on Google Scholar. [15] RG Score: ResearchGate Score or RG Score is an author-level metric introduced by ResearchGate in 2012. [16]
Technorati is a search engine and a publisher advertising platform. Technorati launched its ad network in 2008. In 2016, Synacor acquired Technorati for $3 million. [2] [3]The company's core product was previously an Internet search engine for searching blogs.
On the other hand, the Web of Science is able to associate Google Scholar with other solutions, for example, Endnote. [18] In other words, Google Scholar covers a larger range of research studies, yet have included bibliographic problems, for example, author sequence, different paper title, etc. ResearcherID has a relatively smaller coverage ...
Microsoft Academic gained prominence because it profiled authors, organizations, keywords, and journals [4] and made the dataset available as open data, in contrast to Google Scholar. The search engine indexed over 260 million publications, [ 5 ] 88 million of which are journal articles.