Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In September 2019, the U.S. unemployment rate dropped to 3.5%, near the lowest rate in 50 years. [20] On May 8, 2020, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 20.5 million nonfarm jobs were lost and the unemployment rate rose to 14.7 percent in April, due to the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States .
Unemployment in the US by State (June 2023) The list of U.S. states and territories by unemployment rate compares the seasonally adjusted unemployment rates by state and territory, sortable by name, rate, and change. Data are provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in its Geographic Profile of Employment and Unemployment publication.
The values indicate the average annual rate of change in the unemployment rate over the years in office. 1945–present data is from Bureau of Labor Statistics Labor Force Statistics; data prior to 1945 is from McElvaine's The Great Depression, Three Rivers Press (2009), Chapter 4
Just a single month later, the rate had shot up by more than 10%, to 14.8%. This unemployment rate was both the highest rate and largest month-over-month increase in the history of Bureau of Labor ...
Unemployment rate change for each U.S. presidential term from 1949 (data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics) [10] President Political party Period of presidency Unemployment rate at start of presidential term Unemployment rate at end of presidential term Change in unemployment rate during presidential term (percentage points) Harry S. Truman
10-year fixed rate. 5.98%. 5/1 adjustable rate mortgage. 6.25%. 30-year fixed FHA rate. ... and the unemployment rate has moved up but remains low" while acknowledging a "somewhat elevated ...
Meanwhile, the unemployment rate fell to 4.1%, from 4.2% in August. ... Wage growth, an important measure for gauging inflation pressures, rose to 4% year over year, from a 3.9% annual gain in ...
The median-age of male was increased from 34 years old to 37.2 years old. In addition, baby-boomer numbers increased which meant more people over 65 years old, and fewer people who were of labor age. With these numbers, even though the labor force participation rate remained same, the aging in population still could affect and drag the LFPR down.