Ad
related to: how to cite primary source within secondary source- Free Sentence Checker
Free online proofreading tool.
Find and fix errors quickly.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Free Punctuation Checker
Fix punctuation and spelling.
Find errors instantly.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Sentence Checker
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
When citing a secondary source quoting a primary source, it is good practice is to verify that the secondary source is quoting the primary source correctly, and to add an ancillary citation to the primary source itself. If you can not find the original primary source, do not cite it. i.e. if you have seen only the secondary source, your ...
A secondary source is significantly separated from these primary sources. A reporter's notebook is an (unpublished) primary source, and the news story published by the reporter based on those notes is also a primary source. This is because the sole purpose of the notes in the notebook is to produce the news report.
Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and to avoid novel interpretations of primary sources. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than to an original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors.
A secondary source may summarize many experiments that prove a general point. While this in many cases is most desirable, occasionally it is desirable to document a particular experiment or study. For example, it is nice to provide readers with a direct link to the original publication of a major advance, and sometimes also to provide some ...
When the policy says that "articles should be based upon" secondary sources, the policy means that a majority of the content and the major themes for an article should be cite-able with reliable secondary sources. It doesn't mean that you can't ever cite a primary source for anything. About whether editors should prefer the primary literature:
Secondary sources are documents or people that summarize other material, usually primary source material. They are academics, journalists, and other researchers, and the papers and books they produce. A theologian's account of what the Bible says is a secondary source. A sociologist thesis based on his research of primary sources is a secondary ...
A primary source can be a person with direct knowledge of a situation or it may be a document created by such a person. A secondary source is one that gives information about a primary source. In a secondary source, the original information is selected, modified and arranged in a suitable format.
A short citation is an inline citation that identifies the place in a source where specific information can be found, but without giving full details of the source. Some Wikipedia articles use it, giving summary information about the source together with a page number.
Ad
related to: how to cite primary source within secondary source