Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Lok Adalat can take up civil cases (including marriage and family disputes) and compoundable criminal cases. The decision of a Lok Adalat deciding any case coming before it is deemed as final, and any award or decree issued is enforceable on competing parties. [16] Additionally, the issued order cannot be recalled or reviewed by the court.
The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) is a statutory body of India established on 9 November 1995 under the Legal Services Authorities Act 1987.Its purpose is to provide free legal services to eligible candidates (defined in Section 12 of the Act), and to organize Lok Adalats for speedy resolution of cases.
These authorities periodically organize 'lok-adalats' (Hindi for Public Court) for out-of-the-court settlement of the cases (under provision of the law). There are two types of lok adalats i.e Permanent Lok Adalat (public utility services), and non permanent lok adalat (simply known as Lok Adalat).
Lok Adalat settles disputes which can be mutually resolved and mostly relating to matrimonial, damages [7] and partition suits. The following are the requirements of the cases before Lok Adalat: [8] Lok Adalat takes up cases which are civil in nature (including marriage, and family disputes) and compoundable criminal cases. [7]
Lok Adalat settles disputes which can be mutually resolved and mostly relating to matrimonial, damages [6] and partition suits. The following are the requirements of the cases before Lok Adalat: [7] Lok Adalat takes up cases which are civil in nature (including marriage, and family disputes) and compoundable criminal cases. [6]
Permanent Lok Adalat - Provides mechanism for adjudging cases referred under public utility services like transport, postal and telegraph. National Lok Adalat - Held from year 2015, every month on specific topic across India. These are held on a single day disposing off large number of pending cases. Mega Lok Adalat - Held across all courts in ...
Name of the case Year Judgement T. S. R. Subramanian v. Union of India [43] 2013 Officers of the IAS, other All India Services and other civil servants are not bound to follow oral directives, as they "undermine credibility". Lily Thomas v. Union of India along with Lok Prahari v. Union of India [44] 2013
However, some states denied the existence of the creamy layer, and a report commissioned by the supreme court was not implemented. The case was pressed again in 1999 and the supreme court reaffirmed the creamy layer exclusion and extended it to SCs and STs. [8] General Manager Southern Railway v. Rangachari AIR 1962 SC 36, State of Punjab v ...