Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Federal Trade Commission is an independent regulatory agency responsible for protecting consumers and competition. [20] [21] In 1995, the FTC became involved with privacy regulation. At the beginning, the agency promoted self regulation as they encouraged companies to produce their own privacy policies that the FTC would help enforce.
The FTC Act does not give consumers the right to sue for violations of the act, but consumers may complain to the Commission about acts or practices they believe to be unfair or deceptive. [14] Consumers may, however, be authorized to sue under a state "UDAP" (unfair, deceptive and abusive practices) statute, sometimes called a "Little FTC Act."
The FTC was established in 1914 by the Federal Trade Commission Act, which was passed in response to the 19th-century monopolistic trust crisis. Since its inception, the FTC has enforced the provisions of the Clayton Act , a key U.S. antitrust statute, as well as the provisions of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq.
A 2015 study released by the Federal Trade Commission found that 23% of consumers identified inaccurate information in their credit reports. [6] Under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), an amendment to the FCRA passed in 2003, consumers are able to receive a free copy of their consumer report from each credit reporting ...
He said the applicable provision "has nothing to do with private funds." Private funds' assets under management swelled to $26.6 trillion in 2022 from $9.8 trillion a decade earlier, as the number ...
The Federal Trade Commission is steadily expanding the scope of what it can do for privacy. FTC declares war on ‘pervasive extraction’ and ‘mishandling’ of personal info by targeting ...
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1935 to uphold a law that allows FTC commissioners to be fired only for good cause. The ruling shields a number of independent, bipartisan multi-member agencies ...
The Act came about after the United States Supreme Court held, in United States v. Miller 425 U.S. 435 (1976), that financial records are the property of the financial institution with which they are held, rather than the property of the customer. [ 1 ]