Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[89] The author Ralph H. Lutts wrote in his 1990 work The Nature Fakers: Wildlife, Science & Sentiment that the nature fakers controversy "was far more than a clash over the accuracy of animal stories or the question of whether animals can reason"; rather, the debate signified the changing sensibilities of writers and readers at the turn of the ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
President Theodore Roosevelt, who first spoke out against the "sham naturalists" in 1907, specifically named London as one of the so-called "nature fakers". Citing an example from White Fang , Roosevelt referred to the fight between the bulldog and the wolfdog "the very sublimity of absurdity."
Cornerstone Debate, a nonprofit started by Bergen County Academies' Andrew Chun, supports a debating tradition that's lost ground since the pandemic. As schools shut down debate teams, this Bergen ...
Bulletin Debate (10 P) Pages in category "Literary debates" The following 4 pages are in this category, out of 4 total. ... Nature fakers controversy; P.
“Welcome to Peripheries.I am Rachel Dolezal, your host,” begins the first episode of the podcast.. “So today I’m going to share with you a letter I received from someone I’m going to ...
The divisive nature of disputed subjects has triggered arguments, since opinions on a given issue differ. These subjects are responsible for a great deal of tension among Wikipedia editors, reflecting the debates of society as a whole. Perspectives on these subjects are affected by the time, place, and culture of the editor.