Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court handed the ACLU two key victories in 1957, in Watkins v. United States and Yates v. United States, both of which undermined the Smith Act and marked the beginning of the end of communist party membership inquiries. [206] In 1965, the Supreme Court produced some decisions, including Lamont v.
ACLU v. Ashcroft (2002) Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. 2003 State v. Dalton; McConnell v. FEC; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) - Amicus curiae; Goodridge v. Department of Public Health - Amicus curiae; Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of New England - Amicus curiae; United States v. American Library Association; 2004 ACLU v. Ashcroft (2004 ...
As a result of their successful court challenge to elements of the Patriot Act, the ACLU also forced the FBI to open files it had on antiwar groups, including the ACLU itself. Further, under Romero's leadership, the ACLU became the first organization to successfully file a legal challenge to the Bush administration 's illegal National Security ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
ACLU, legal advocates, district court candidates and DA Todd Williams speak on technology in district court malfunctioning for around two years,
In re Opinions and Orders of This Court Containing Novel or Significant Interpretations of Law, Misc 16-01, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, (October 19, 2016), or Motion of the American Civil Liberties Union for the Release of Court Records, or ACLU Motion for Release of Court Records, is a legal case filed by the American Civil Liberties Union before the FISA court.
The day after Donald Trump’s election in November 2016, the American Civil Liberties Union posted a message to him on its website: “See you in court.” As president, Trump hasn’t personally ...
American Civil Liberties Union v. Miller, 977 F.Supp. 1228 (1997), was a court case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia between the ACLU and Georgia governor Zell Miller. [1] [2] The case was an early precedent on the ability of individuals to use the World Wide Web anonymously.