Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The artist at the time of the sale is a United States citizen or has been a California resident for at least two years. The seller resides in California or the sale takes place in California. The work is an original painting, drawing, sculpture or original work of art in glass. The work is sold by the seller for more money than she or he paid.
The law is codified at California Civil Code § 987. [4] The California Art Preservation Act was the first major law to specifically address artists' rights in the United States. [6] [7] Portions of the law may overlap with the provisions of the Visual Artists Rights Act, in which case the California law is preempted by the federal law. [8]
Camouflage is the use of any combination of materials, coloration, or illumination for concealment, either by making animals or objects hard to see, or by disguising them as something else. Examples include the leopard 's spotted coat, the battledress of a modern soldier , and the leaf-mimic katydid 's wings.
Camouflage is weakened by motion, but active camouflage could still make moving targets more difficult to see. However, active camouflage works best in one direction at a time, requiring knowledge of the relative positions of the observer and the concealed object. [1] An invisibility cloak using active camouflage by Susumu Tachi. Left: The ...
Multi-spectral camouflage can be applied to individuals, to vehicles, and to buildings. It can take the form of specialised paints or camouflage nets that provide conventional camouflage, reduce the amount of heat given off by an object, and alter the shape and size of its radar signature.
Methods include camouflage, nocturnality, subterranean lifestyle and mimicry. Crypsis can involve visual, olfactory (with pheromones) or auditory concealment. When it is visual, the term cryptic coloration, effectively a synonym for animal camouflage, is sometimes used, but many different methods of camouflage are employed in nature.
For example, it was unclear how a decision in Varsity's favor might affect military-style camouflage patterns, and whether they could be restricted if fashion designs were copyrightable. Varsity supported the idea of camouflage copyrights, although Justice Elena Kagan pointed out the clearly utilitarian function of camouflage patterns ...
Military camouflage is the use of camouflage by an armed force to protect personnel and equipment from observation by enemy forces. In practice, this means applying colour and materials to military equipment of all kinds, including vehicles, ships, aircraft, gun positions and battledress, either to conceal it from observation (), or to make it appear as something else ().