Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (1954) civil rights; 1957 Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957) - Amicus curiae for Samuel Roth; Watkins v. United States; Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957) - Amicus curiae for Yates; 1958 Kent v. Dulles; Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958) - ACLU lawyer Lawrence Speiser defended himself; Trop ...
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.
The lawsuits – including a defamation case from the Central Park Five, eight lawsuits over Trump’s role in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol and two cases related to the clearing ...
Judge Jeremy Kernodle, U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas, called for Vice President Pence to issue a response to the lawsuit by December 31, 2020, at 5 p.m. and for Gohmert to issue a reply to Pence by January 1, 2021, at 9 a.m. [73] Pence replied on December 31 that the suit should be dismissed because he is not the ...
In a case that sits squarely at the intersection of his business and political interests, President Donald Trump is trying to stop a civil lawsuit against his multibillion-dollar social media ...
Julia Kaye, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, which is fighting abortion restrictions nationally, said that after the Supreme Court's ruling, "this outrageous case should have been ...
The list excludes cases that only name Trump as a legal formality in his capacity as president, such as habeas corpus requests. On August 1, 2023, Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury on four criminal conspiracy and obstruction charges related to attempts to overturn the 2020 election .
Johnson & Johnson has twice been unsuccessful in using a controversial bankruptcy tactic to contain lawsuits alleging its baby powder caused cancer. The third time, J&J said, will be different.