Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A given Internet Standard, STD n, may be RFCs x and y at a given time, but later the same standard may be updated to be RFC z instead. For example, in 2007 RFC 3700 was an Internet Standard—STD 1—and in May 2008 it was replaced with RFC 5000, so RFC 3700 changed to Historic, RFC 5000 became an Internet Standard, and as of May 2008 STD 1 is ...
RFC 1950 : ZLIB Compressed Data Format Specification version 3.3: May 1996: Zlib v 3.3: RFC 1951 : DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification version 1.3: May 1996: DEFLATE v 1.3: RFC 1952 : GZIP file format specification version 4.3: May 1996: Gzip v 4.3: RFC 1964 : The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API Mechanism: June 1996: Kerberos; GSSAPI: RFC ...
The final revised documentation for PDF 1.7 was approved by ISO Technical Committee 171 in January 2008 and published as ISO 32000-1:2008 on July 1, 2008, and titled Document management – Portable document format – Part 1: PDF 1.7. ISO 32000-1:2008 is the first ISO standard for full function PDF.
Forms Data Format (FDF) based on PDF, uses the same syntax and has essentially the same file structure, but is much simpler than PDF since the body of an FDF document consists of only one required object. Forms Data Format is defined in the PDF specification (since PDF 1.2). The Forms Data Format can be used when submitting form data to a ...
Since 1992, a new document was written to specify the evolution of the basic protocol towards its next full version. It supported both the simple request method of the 0.9 version and the full GET request that included the client HTTP version. This was the first of the many unofficial HTTP/1.0 drafts that preceded the final work on HTTP/1.0. [3]
Larry Melvin Masinter is an early internet pioneer and ACM Fellow. [1] After attending Stanford University, [2] he became a principal scientist [3] of Xerox Artificial Intelligence Systems and author or coauthor of 26 of the Internet Engineering Task Force's Requests for Comments.
In some situations, such as when you expect an extremely high number of comments or there is no obviously relevant talk page, you may instead place an RfC discussion on a subpage of an appropriate, relevant page, such as: a subpage of the article's talk page, of a project page (or its talk page), of one of the Village pumps, or of this page ...
Propose the text of the RfC question on the talk page before starting the RfC. Especially get feedback on whether the question is neutral from the editors who disagree with you. All other things being equal, make the question shorter, because shorter questions have fewer chances for accidental deviations from neutrality.