Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Full case name: Dynamex Operations West, Inc., v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest: Citation(s) 4 Cal.5th 903, 416 P.3d 1, 232 Cal.Rptr.3d 1: Case history; Prior history: Review granted from 179 Cal.Rptr.3d 69: Holding
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra , 585 U.S. 755 (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the constitutionality of California's FACT Act, which mandated that crisis pregnancy centers provide certain disclosures about state services.
If the lawyer filling out the Case Information Statement makes a mistake, or if circumstances change or new information is discovered, the party wishing to amend the statement may do so by making a motion to the judge in charge of the case. Some courts use the term Cover Sheet for this document, but the content and purpose is the same.
Finally on January 22, 2000, in accordance with Proposition 220 passed in 1998, the Judges of the Municipal and Superior Courts voted to merge into the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. [2] In 2000, a pilot Complex Civil Litigation Program was established in the Los Angeles Superior Court, [3] which has since been made ...
The slayings occurred on Nov. 28, 2021, in the family's home in Lancaster, a city in the Antelope Valley high desert north of Los Angeles. Man convicted in Southern California slayings of his 4 ...
One quirk of California law is that when a party petitions the appellate courts for a writ of mandate (California's version of mandamus), the case name becomes [petitioner name] v. Superior Court (that is, the superior court is the respondent on appeal), and the real opponent is then listed below those names as the " real party in interest ".
The building houses attorneys from Los Angeles County Counsel, Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers, and Children's Law Center. In 2012, the media gained unprecedented access to the court. [1] At that time, about 25,000 cases annually went before the combined 21 judges, commissioners and referees who oversee the cases. [2]
Los Angeles has agreed to pay $300,000 to cover the legal fees of a local journalist and a technology watchdog group that had been sued by the city last year for publishing photos of names and ...