enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Jumping to conclusions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_to_conclusions

    Jumping to conclusions (officially the jumping conclusion bias, often abbreviated as JTC, and also referred to as the inference-observation confusion [1]) is a psychological term referring to a communication obstacle where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having all the facts; to reach unwarranted conclusions".

  3. Reductio ad absurdum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum

    Reductio ad absurdum, painting by John Pettie exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1884. In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for "argument to absurdity") or apagogical argument, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.

  4. List of cognitive biases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases

    The framing effect is the tendency to draw different conclusions from the same information, depending on how that information is presented. Forms of the framing effect include: Contrast effect , the enhancement or reduction of a certain stimulus's perception when compared with a recently observed, contrasting object.

  5. Cognitive distortion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_distortion

    It is a more extreme form of jumping-to-conclusions cognitive distortion where one presumes to know the thoughts, feelings, or intentions of others without any factual basis. Emotional reasoning [ edit ]

  6. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Naturalistic fallacy – inferring evaluative conclusions from purely factual premises [105] [106] in violation of fact-value distinction. Naturalistic fallacy (sometimes confused with appeal to nature) is the inverse of moralistic fallacy. Is–ought fallacy [107] – deduce a conclusion about what ought to be, on the basis of what is.

  7. NYT ‘Connections’ Hints and Answers Today, Saturday, February 15

    www.aol.com/nyt-connections-hints-answers-today...

    Spoilers ahead! We've warned you. We mean it. Read no further until you really want some clues or you've completely given up and want the answers ASAP. Get ready for all of today's NYT ...

  8. Faulty generalization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulty_generalization

    A faulty generalization is an informal fallacy wherein a conclusion is drawn about all or many instances of a phenomenon on the basis of one or a few instances of that phenomenon. It is similar to a proof by example in mathematics. [1] It is an example of jumping to conclusions. [2]

  9. Elon Musk’s photo from Trump’s rally has the internet in ...

    www.aol.com/elon-musk-photo-trump-rally...

    Social media users jumped online to capture Elon Musk’s big on-stage moment at former president Donald Trump’s rally on Saturday.. On October 5, the the world’s wealthiest man joined the ...