Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A self-published source can be independent, authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, and expert-approved. Self-published sources can be reliable, and they can be used (but not for third-party claims about living people). Sometimes, a self-published source is even the best possible source or among the best sources. For example:
Unless the source exercises editorial control, e-prints and conference abstracts should be considered to be self-published. The above questions can be used to consider the reliability of self-published scientific material. See the policy on self-published sources at WP:SPS. Many of them are also primary sources, which should be treated with ...
For that reason, self-published sources are largely not acceptable. Self-published books and newsletters, personal pages on social networking sites, tweets, and posts on Internet forums are all examples of self-published media. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter ...
This has been incorrectly transformed into an "always" statement in the new ===Unacceptable=== section: "A non-self-published source that verifies the same information is available. These are always preferable." Non-self-published sources are not always preferable. Sometimes the original is the authoritative and therefore best possible source.
A collection of poker stories. Author is believed to be another pseudonym of S. W. Erdnase. [6] The Autobiography of a Flea, erotic novel published in 1901. The Expert at the Card Table by S. W. Erdnase, a book on sleight-of-hand with cards for card advantage play and magic, self-published in 1902 in Chicago.
Secondary sources can be unreliable, biased, self-serving and self-published. According to our content guideline on identifying reliable sources, reliable sources have most, if not all, of the following characteristics: It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published by a reputable publishing house, rather than by the author(s).
4.1 Non-expert self-published. 4.2 Questionable sources. ... This is an essay on the accepted levels of evidence on Wikipedia. ... Any source listed as green at WP: ...
Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and news coverage (not opinions) from mainstream newspapers. Self-published media, where the author and publisher are the same, are usually not acceptable as sources. These can include newsletters, personal websites, press ...