Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Constitutional Court held that the issue of whether socio-economic rights are justiciable at all in South Africa is put beyond question by the text of the Constitution as construed in the judgment Ex parte Chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly: In re Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. [6]
2023. 2024. v. t. e. The table below lists the judgments of the Constitutional Court of South Africa delivered in 2020 . The members of the court at the start of 2020 were Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, and judges Johan Froneman, Chris Jafta, Sisi Khampepe, Mbuyiseli Madlanga, Steven Majiedt, Nonkosi Mhlantla ...
Mogoeng CJ. Bwanya v Master of the High Court, Cape Town and Others is an important decision in the South African law of succession and particularly the law of intestate succession. It was decided by the Constitutional Court of South Africa on 31 December 2021 with a majority judgment written by Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga.
The High Court of South Africa is a superior court of law in South Africa. It is divided into nine provincial divisions, some of which sit in more than one location. Each High Court division has general jurisdiction over a defined geographical area in which it is situated. The decisions of a division are binding on magistrates' courts within ...
The table below lists the judgments of the Constitutional Court of South Africa delivered in 2021. The members of the court at the start of 2021 were Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng , Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo , and judges Chris Jafta , Sisi Khampepe , Mbuyiseli Madlanga , Steven Majiedt , Nonkosi Mhlantla , Leona Theron and Zukisa Tshiqi .
In this, the Constitutional Court confirmed the reading of the High Court in South African Human Rights Commission v Khumalo. [4] Dealing with an ambiguity in the syntax of section 10(1), the court also agreed with Khumalo that paragraphs (a) to (c) of section 10(1) should be read conjunctively, rather than disjunctively as proposed by the ...
Decision by. Froneman J (unanimous) Gundwana v Steko Development CC and Others is an important case in South African property law and civil procedure. The Constitutional Court held unanimously that Registrars of the High Court are not constitutionally competent to authorise sales in execution of mortgaged homes when granting a default judgment.
This page was last edited on 7 February 2024, at 23:39 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.