Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This real Jordan form is a consequence of the complex Jordan form. For a real matrix the nonreal eigenvectors and generalized eigenvectors can always be chosen to form complex conjugate pairs. Taking the real and imaginary part (linear combination of the vector and its conjugate), the matrix has this form with respect to the new basis.
Let () (that is, a n × n complex matrix) and () be the change of basis matrix to the Jordan normal form of A; that is, A = C −1 JC.Now let f (z) be a holomorphic function on an open set such that ; that is, the spectrum of the matrix is contained inside the domain of holomorphy of f.
The rational canonical form is determined by the elementary divisors of A; these can be immediately read off from a matrix in Jordan form, but they can also be determined directly for any matrix by computing the Smith normal form, over the ring of polynomials, of the matrix (with polynomial entries) XI n − A (the same one whose determinant ...
The decomposition has a short description when the Jordan normal form of the operator is given, but it exists under weaker hypotheses than are needed for the existence of a Jordan normal form. Hence the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition can be seen as a generalisation of the Jordan normal form, which is also reflected in several proofs of it.
The classical result for square matrices is the Jordan canonical form, which states the following: Theorem. Let A be an n × n complex matrix, i.e. A a linear operator acting on C n. If λ 1...λ k are the distinct eigenvalues of A, then C n can be decomposed into the invariant subspaces of A
The Jordan normal form and the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition. Applicable to: square matrix A; Comment: the Jordan normal form generalizes the eigendecomposition to cases where there are repeated eigenvalues and cannot be diagonalized, the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition does this without choosing a basis.
A more precise statement is given by the Jordan normal form theorem, which states that in this situation, A is similar to an upper triangular matrix of a very particular form. The simpler triangularization result is often sufficient however, and in any case used in proving the Jordan normal form theorem. [1] [3]
Rather, the Jordan canonical form of () contains one Jordan block for each distinct root; if the multiplicity of the root is m, then the block is an m × m matrix with on the diagonal and 1 in the entries just above the diagonal. in this case, V becomes a confluent Vandermonde matrix. [2]