enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics

    Ethics is closely connected to value theory, which studies the nature and types of value, like the contrast between intrinsic and instrumental value. Moral psychology is a related empirical field and investigates psychological processes involved in morality, such as reasoning and the formation of character.

  3. Morality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality

    Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is the branch of philosophy which addresses questions of morality. The word "ethics" is "commonly used interchangeably with 'morality' ... and sometimes it is used more narrowly to mean the moral principles of a particular tradition, group, or individual."

  4. Philosophy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy

    Chinese philosophy focuses principally on practical issues about right social conduct, government, and self-cultivation. Major branches of philosophy are epistemology, ethics, logic, and metaphysics. Epistemology studies what knowledge is and how to acquire it. Ethics investigates moral principles and what constitutes right conduct.

  5. Outline of ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_ethics

    Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is the branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. [1] The field of ethics, along with aesthetics , concern matters of value , and thus comprise the branch of philosophy called axiology .

  6. Value (ethics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_(ethics)

    The difference between these two types of systems can be seen when people state that they hold one value system yet in practice deviate from it, thus holding a different value system. For example, a religion lists an absolute set of values while the practice of that religion may include exceptions.

  7. Fact–value distinction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact–value_distinction

    This barrier between fact and value, as construed in epistemology, implies it is impossible to derive ethical claims from factual arguments, or to defend the former using the latter. [2] The fact–value distinction is closely related to, and derived from, the is–ought problem in moral philosophy, characterized by David Hume. [3]

  8. Consequentialism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism

    Consequentialism, along with eudaimonism, falls under the broader category of teleological ethics, a group of views which claim that the moral value of any act consists in its tendency to produce things of intrinsic value. [1]

  9. Euthyphro dilemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthyphro_dilemma

    The difference between desiring good and desiring evil is that in the former, will and reason are in harmony, whereas in the latter, they are in discord. [ 120 ] Aquinas's discussion of sin provides a good point of entry to his philosophical explanation of why the nature of God is the standard for value.