enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Inductive reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning

    Inductive reasoning is a form of argument that—in contrast to deductive reasoning—allows for the possibility that a conclusion can be false, even if all of the premises are true. [39] This difference between deductive and inductive reasoning is reflected in the terminology used to describe deductive and inductive arguments.

  3. Deductive reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning

    This theory of deductive reasoning – also known as term logic – was developed by Aristotle, but was superseded by propositional (sentential) logic and predicate logic. [citation needed] Deductive reasoning can be contrasted with inductive reasoning, in regards to validity and soundness. In cases of inductive reasoning, even though the ...

  4. Problem of induction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction

    While deductive logic allows one to arrive at a conclusion with certainty, inductive logic can only provide a conclusion that is probably true. [non-primary source needed] It is mistaken to frame the difference between deductive and inductive logic as one between general to specific reasoning and specific to general reasoning. This is a common ...

  5. Deduction and induction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction_and_induction

    Deductive reasoning; Inductive reasoning; Validity (logic) Cogency (disambiguation) This page was last edited on 21 May 2020, at 12:06 (UTC). Text is available under ...

  6. Logical reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_reasoning

    Non-deductive reasoning is an important form of logical reasoning besides deductive reasoning. It happens in the form of inferences drawn from premises to reach and support a conclusion, just like its deductive counterpart. The hallmark of non-deductive reasoning is that this support is fallible.

  7. Psychology of reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology_of_reasoning

    Scientists use inductive reasoning to create theories and hypotheses. [29] Philip Johnson-Laird distinguished inductive from deductive reasoning, in that the former creates semantic information while the later does not . [27]: 439 In opposition, deductive reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. [29]

  8. Logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

    But even arguments that are not deductively valid may still be good arguments because their premises offer non-deductive support to their conclusions. For such cases, the term ampliative or inductive reasoning is used. [63] Deductive arguments are associated with formal logic in contrast to the relation between ampliative arguments and informal ...

  9. Logic and rationality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_and_rationality

    Other forms of reasoning are sometimes also taken to be part of logic, such as inductive reasoning and abductive reasoning, which are forms of reasoning that are not purely deductive, but include material inference. Similarly, it is important to distinguish deductive validity and inductive validity (called "strength").