Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikiversity is a Wikimedia Foundation project [2] [3] ... Students are able to free resort to any mean of support. At the same time, it fosters cognitive development, ...
Wikiversity is a Wikimedia Foundation project [1] [2] that supports learning communities, their learning materials, and resulting activities. As of December 2024, Wikiversity learning modules have been created in 17 editions, with 17 currently active and 0 closed. [3] This is a table of detailed statistics of Wikiversities.
Content copied from Wikiversity to Wikipedia needs to conform to the context in Wikipedia, as well as criteria including WP:Notability and WP:Reliable sources.Also, as content is by default licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike license, an attribution should be made, at least by mentioning the source article in the edit summary.
Within the OER movement, the Wikiversity was founded in 2006 and the first open course on the platform was organised in 2007. A ten-week course with more than 70 students was used to test the idea of making Wikiversity an open and free platform for education in the tradition of Scandinavian free adult education, Folk High School and the free ...
Wikiversity is also the first WikiMedia project that is open to hosting and fostering research. Wikiversity's fundamental unit is neither a book (Wikibooks) nor an encyclopedia article (Wikipedia); it is a learning resource (see Learning Resources). A learning resource is a text or genre which can outwardly resemble a book or an article, but ...
However, if a word or phrase is commonly wikified, it is quite likely that the deleted entry will be quickly re-created again by well-meaning users. The re-created article is likely to again become non-encyclopedic. To avoid this, do seek deletion of the page (or suppress after transwiki'ing).
Can mean Wikipedia:Requests for adminship or (rarely) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration, depending on the context. The latter is frequently abbreviated RfAr to avoid the ambiguity. RfA cliché #1 Sometimes used in support at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, to indicate that one thought the candidate already was an admin.
Wikiversity-based sources are considered no more reliable than other wiki-based pages, and in general material on Wikiversity should be treated with the same level of trust (i.e., generally very little) as any other self-published source. The reliability and robustness of Wikiversity's 'peer review' process is untested.