enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Eichman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Eichman

    Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that by a 5–4 decision invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as a violation of free speech under the First Amendment. [1] It was argued together with the case United States v. Haggerty. It built on the opinion handed down in the Court's decision the prior year ...

  3. 1896 in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1896_in_the_United_States

    Lewis Strauss, chair of the United States Atomic Energy Commission (died 1974) February 7 – Bonner Fellers, United States Army general (died 1973) February 21 – Homa J. Porter, Texas businessman and political activist (died 1986) February 25 – John Little McClellan, U.S. Senator from Arkansas from 1943 to 1977 (died 1977)

  4. Allen v. United States (1896) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_v._United_States_(1896)

    Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case that, among other things, approved the use of a jury instruction intended to prevent a hung jury by encouraging jurors in the minority to reconsider. The Court affirmed Alexander Allen's murder conviction, having vacated his two prior convictions for the same crime.

  5. Vidal v. Elster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidal_v._Elster

    Vidal v. Elster, 602 U.S. 286, is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with 15 U.S.C. § 1052, a provision of the Lanham Act regarding trademarks using the name of living individuals without their consent.

  6. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Film_Corp._v...

    Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 236 U.S. 230 (1915), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling by a 9–0 vote that the free speech protection of the Ohio Constitution, which was substantially similar to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, did not extend to motion pictures.

  7. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumsfeld_v._Forum_for...

    Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold funding from universities if they refuse to give military recruiters access to school resources.

  8. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Hudson_Gas...

    Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission, 447 U.S. 557 (1980), was an important case decided by the United States Supreme Court that laid out a four-part test for determining when restrictions on commercial speech violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Justice Powell wrote the opinion of the ...

  9. Cox v. New Hampshire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox_v._New_Hampshire

    Cox v. New Hampshire , 312 U.S. 569 (1941), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, although the government cannot regulate the contents of speech, it can place reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech for the public safety. [ 1 ]