enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Affirming a disjunct - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_a_disjunct

   Affirming a disjunct is a fallacy. The formal fallacy of affirming a disjunct also known as the fallacy of the alternative disjunct or a false exclusionary disjunct occurs when a deductive argument takes the following logical form: [1] A or B A Therefore, not B. Or in logical operators:

3. Disjunctive syllogism - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_syllogism

   In classical logic, disjunctive syllogism [1] [2] (historically known as modus tollendo ponens (MTP), [3] Latin for "mode that affirms by denying") [4] is a valid argument form which is a syllogism having a disjunctive statement for one of its premises.

4. Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_conclusion...

   Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative) is a formal fallacy that is committed when a categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion and one or two negative premises.

5. Denying the antecedent - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denying_the_antecedent

   One way to demonstrate the invalidity of this argument form is with an example that has true premises but an obviously false conclusion. For example:

6. AOL Mail

   mail.aol.com

   Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

7. Side letter (contract law) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_letter_(contract_law)

   Side letters may also be used in relation to private fund contracts, for example a particular investor may wish to vary the terms of a limited partnership agreement with respect to that particular investor. An investor might be seeking more favourable terms under the contract or might need the side letter to enter the venture under terms to ...

8. Material implication (rule of inference) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_implication_(rule...

   Then if is true, that rules out the first disjunct, so we have . In short, P → Q {\displaystyle P\to Q} . [ 3 ] However, if P {\displaystyle P} is false, then this entailment fails, because the first disjunct ¬ P {\displaystyle \neg P} is true, which puts no constraint on the second disjunct Q {\displaystyle Q} .

9. Gang-tied illegal immigrant ‘giggled’ as he confessed to ...

   www.aol.com/gang-tied-illegal-immigrant-giggled...

   A Honduras gang member who was illegally in the US “giggled” as he admitted kidnapping a young Texas woman at gunpoint and threatening to pimp her out and sell her organs, according to cops.