enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of audio coding formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_audio_coding...

    For example, MP3 and AAC dominate the personal audio market in terms of market share, though many other formats are comparably well suited to fill this role from a purely technical standpoint. First public release date is first of either specification publishing or source releasing, or in the case of closed-specification, closed-source codecs ...

  3. Windows Media Audio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Media_Audio

    At 48 kbit/s Archived 2014-07-08 at the Wayback Machine, WMA 10 Pro was ranked second after Nero HE-AAC and better than WMA 9.2 in an independent listening test organized and supported by Sebastian Mares and Hydrogenaudio Forums in December 2006. This test, however, used CBR for WMA 10 Pro and VBR for the other codecs.

  4. Advanced Audio Coding - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding

    Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) is an audio coding standard for lossy digital audio compression. It was designed to be the successor of the MP3 format and generally achieves higher sound quality than MP3 at the same bit rate. [4] AAC has been standardized by ISO and IEC as part of the MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 specifications.

  5. Audio file format - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_file_format

    Audio file icons of various formats. An audio file format is a file format for storing digital audio data on a computer system. The bit layout of the audio data (excluding metadata) is called the audio coding format and can be uncompressed, or compressed to reduce the file size, often using lossy compression.

  6. Audio coding format - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_coding_format

    A lossless audio coding format reduces the total data needed to represent a sound but can be de-coded to its original, uncompressed form. A lossy audio coding format additionally reduces the bit resolution of the sound on top of compression, which results in far less data at the cost of irretrievably lost information.

  7. Comparison of video container formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video...

    AAC-LC, HE-AAC: AAC-LC, HE-AAC v1 MP3: Lossy: 1991-12 Expired patents [87] Yes Yes MPEG-1 Audio Yes Yes [β] Yes Yes No No AC-3: Lossy: 1991-02 Expired patents Yes Yes [90] Yes Yes Yes Yes Private No No E-AC-3: Lossy: 2005-02 Patent encumbered QuickTime [γ] Yes Yes Yes No No No No No DTS: Lossy: 1993-06 Proprietary: Yes Yes No Yes Yes No ...

  8. Comparison of digital audio editors - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_digital...

    AAC Ogg REX2 AIFF FLAC Others Renoise: No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes MP4, MP4A, CAF, SFZ RiffWorks: No No No Export No No Export Yes No No Rosegarden: No No Yes [9] Yes [10] Import [10] Un­known Import [10] Un­known Un­known Import [10] Csound, Mup, MuxicXML, h2song [11] Samplitude: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes WMA, RealAudio ...

  9. Codec listening test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec_listening_test

    WMA Professional 10 1-pass CBR, 48 kbit/s; Nero HE-AAC May 26, 2006-q 0.2; WMA Standard 9.2 Quality-Based VBR, Q10; iTunes AAC 7.0.2.16 48 kbit/s, CBR; Various 20 22-34 Nero HE-AAC: WMA Professional and aoTuV tied for second Sebastian Mares: 2007 July multiple ~64 Ogg Vorbis AoTuV 5 Beta-q 0; WMA Professional 10 1-pass CBR, 64 kbit/s; Nero HE ...