Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Demers v. Austin (746 F.3d 402, 9th Cir., 2014) was a landmark decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, extending First Amendment protection to professors at public universities for on-the-job speech that deals with public issues related to teaching or scholarship, whether inside or outside of the classroom. [1]
Pages in category "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases" The following 162 pages are in this category, out of 162 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .
The case was appealed to the Supreme Court at the end of 2020, but with Trump leaving office in January 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that the case was rendered moot. [4] O'Connor-Ratcliff and Zane petitioned the Supreme Court to hear their case on October 4, 2022. On April 24, 2023, the Court granted certiorari.
But the 9th Circuit did not rule COVID-19 shots are not vaccines, said Dorit Reiss, a law professor at the University of California College of the Law San Francisco whose research includes legal ...
Though no legal action has happened in Texas’ case against the new Title IX rules, on June 11 a North Texas U.S. District Court struck down nonbinding guidance from the Education Department in ...
With two split panels in a row ruling in opposite ways, the case could be taken up by a 11-judge "en banc" panel of the 9th Circuit or appealed to the conservative U.S. Supreme Court, which has ...
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2017, H.R. 196 [24] The more recent proposals have aimed to redefine the Ninth Circuit to cover California, Hawaii, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands, and to create a new Twelfth Circuit to cover Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
In 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of the case and remanded the case back to the district court. [6] The case was later moved to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in the 5th Circuit. [7]