enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of cryptographic hash functions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of...

    The RIPE Consortium [1] MD4: RIPEMD-128 RIPEMD-256 RIPEMD-160 RIPEMD-320: 1996 Hans Dobbertin Antoon Bosselaers Bart Preneel: RIPEMD: Website Specification: SHA-0: 1993 NSA: SHA-0: SHA-1: 1995 SHA-0: Specification: SHA-256 SHA-384 SHA-512: 2002 SHA-224: 2004 SHA-3 (Keccak) 2008 Guido Bertoni Joan Daemen Michaël Peeters Gilles Van Assche ...

  3. Secure Hash Algorithms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Hash_Algorithms

    SHA-2: A family of two similar hash functions, with different block sizes, known as SHA-256 and SHA-512. They differ in the word size; SHA-256 uses 32-bit words where SHA-512 uses 64-bit words. There are also truncated versions of each standard, known as SHA-224, SHA-384, SHA-512/224 and SHA-512/256. These were also designed by the NSA.

  4. BLAKE (hash function) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLAKE_(hash_function)

    Function Mix Inputs: V a, V b, V c, V d four 8-byte word entries from the work vector V x, y two 8-byte word entries from padded message m Output: V a, V b, V c, V d the modified versions of V a, V b, V c, V d V a ← V a + V b + x with input V d ← (V d xor V a) rotateright 32 V c ← V c + V d no input V b ← (V b xor V c) rotateright 24 V ...

  5. SHA-2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2

    SHA-2 (Secure Hash Algorithm 2) is a set of cryptographic hash functions designed by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) and first published in 2001. [3] [4] They are built using the Merkle–Damgård construction, from a one-way compression function itself built using the Davies–Meyer structure from a specialized block cipher.

  6. DomainKeys Identified Mail - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail

    First, the message body is hashed, always from the beginning, possibly truncated to a given length l (which may be zero). Second, selected header fields are hashed, in the order given by h . Repeated field names are matched from the bottom of the header upward, which is the order in which Received: fields are inserted in the header.

  7. Comparison of TLS implementations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_TLS...

    A workaround for SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0, roughly equivalent to random IVs from TLS 1.1, was widely adopted by many implementations in late 2011. [30] In 2014, the POODLE vulnerability of SSL 3.0 was discovered, which takes advantage of the known vulnerabilities in CBC, and an insecure fallback negotiation used in browsers.

  8. Length extension attack - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_extension_attack

    In cryptography and computer security, a length extension attack is a type of attack where an attacker can use Hash(message 1) and the length of message 1 to calculate Hash(message 1 ‖ message 2) for an attacker-controlled message 2, without needing to know the content of message 1.

  9. Comparison of cryptography libraries - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cryptography...

    Comparison of implementations of message authentication code (MAC) algorithms. A MAC is a short piece of information used to authenticate a message—in other words, to confirm that the message came from the stated sender (its authenticity) and has not been changed in transit (its integrity).