enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  3. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidated_Standards_of...

    The main product of the CONSORT Group is the CONSORT Statement, [1] which is an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting randomized trials.It offers a standard way for authors to prepare reports of trial findings, facilitating their complete and transparent reporting, reducing the influence of bias on their results, and aiding their critical appraisal and interpretation.

  4. Category:Reporting guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Reporting_guidelines

    Pages in category "Reporting guidelines" The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total. ... Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

  5. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  6. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Reviews_and...

    CRD also undertake methods research and produce internationally accepted guidelines for undertaking systematic reviews. The centre's role in developing research evidence to support decision making in policy and practice was highlighted in the Cooksey report on UK health research funding and subsequently in the Government national research ...

  7. Newcastle–Ottawa scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle–Ottawa_scale

    In statistics, the Newcastle–Ottawa scale is a tool used for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies included in a systematic review and/or meta-analyses.Using the tool, each study is judged on eight items, categorized into three groups: the selection of the study groups; the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case ...

  8. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strengthening_the...

    The STROBE Statement was developed by the STROBE Initiative, an international collaboration of epidemiologists, methodologists, statisticians, researchers and journal editors with the aim to assist authors when writing up analytical observational studies, to support editors and reviewers when considering such articles for publication, and to help readers when critically appraising published ...

  9. Cochrane (organisation) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochrane_(organisation)

    It was developed in response to Archie Cochrane's call for up-to-date, systematic reviews of all relevant randomised controlled trials in the field of healthcare. [11] [12] [13] In 1998, the Cochrane Economics Methods Group (CEMG) was established to facilitate the basing of decisions on health economics, evidence-based medicine, and systematic ...