enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Potentially unreliable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    Examples of such promotional journals include Creation Research Society Quarterly, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Homeopathy. Be aware of predatory publishers, for example journals published by OMICS Publishing Group. These are very unlikely to be accepted as reliable sources.

  3. Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_really...

    Insulting, bad puucnktation!! Any meme, no matter how popular or important. We're not saying don't use your Imagination. Anything you don't know the title of. Your wiki or blog. It's probably not internationally famous. If it is, well, go ahead, but let's face it; your blog of cute cats is not internationally famous (three readers is not fame). [1]

  4. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not...

    Articles are only as good as the editors who have been editing them—their interests, biases, education, and background—and the efforts they have put into a particular topic or article. Since we try to avoid original research , a particular article may only be as good as (a) the available and discovered reliable sources , and (b) the subject ...

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    For example, a paper reviewing existing research, a review article, monograph, or textbook is often better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised. Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves ( see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point ...

  6. Wikipedia:List of bad article ideas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_bad...

    Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, or, the list of article ideas that are really, really really bad; so bad that administrators are allowed to delete them on the spot. Wikipedia:Fart; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, list of "prohibited" items Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia:Starting an article

  7. Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use

    However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable because Wikipedia is not a reliable source. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Many [ 4 ] colleges and universities, as well as public and private secondary schools, have policies that prohibit students from using Wikipedia as their source for doing research papers, essays, or ...

  8. Wikipedia:No original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

    Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia , original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published source exists. [ a ] This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources .

  9. Scientific misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct

    Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit. One form is the appropriation of ...