enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Liquid junction potential - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_junction_potential

    The most common method of eliminating the liquid junction potential is to place a salt bridge consisting of a saturated solution of potassium chloride (KCl) and ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3) with lithium acetate (CH 3 COOLi) between the two solutions constituting the junction. When such a bridge is used, the ions in the bridge are present in ...

  3. Saturated squeeze - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturated_squeeze

    The key feature of the saturated squeeze is that it involves threats in all four suits, and all four threats are necessary for the squeeze to function. Accordingly, saturated squeezes can only occur in notrump contracts, and they are always non-simultaneous, with each defender being squeezed in turn as one or more winners are cashed in a suit ...

  4. List of play techniques (bridge) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_play_techniques...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  5. Squeeze play (bridge) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_play_(bridge)

    A squeeze play (or squeeze) is a technique used in contract bridge and other trick-taking games in which the play of a card (the squeeze card) forces an opponent to discard a winner or the guard of a potential winner. The situation typically occurs in the end game, with only a few cards remaining.

  6. Backwash squeeze - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backwash_squeeze

    Backwash squeeze is a rare squeeze which involves squeezing an opponent which lies behind declarer's menace. A variation of this, known as the "Sydney Squeeze" or "Seres Squeeze", was discovered in play at a rubber bridge game in Sydney, Australia, in 1965, by the Australian great Tim Seres; it was later attested by famous bridge theorist Géza Ottlik in an article in The Bridge World in 1974 ...

  7. List of bidding systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bidding_systems

    This is a list of bidding systems used in contract bridge. [1] [2] Systems listed have either had an historical impact on the development of bidding in the game or have been or are currently being used at the national or international levels of competition. Bidding systems are characterized as belonging to one of two broadly defined categories:

  8. Dynamic equilibrium - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_equilibrium

    where k f is the rate constant for the forward reaction and k b is the rate constant for the backward reaction and the square brackets, […], denote concentration. If only A is present at the beginning, time t = 0, with a concentration [A] 0, the sum of the two concentrations, [A] t and [B] t, at time t, will be equal to [A] 0.

  9. Simple squeeze - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_squeeze

    The simple squeeze is the most basic form of a squeeze in contract bridge. When declarer plays a winner in one suit (the squeeze card), an opponent is forced to discard a stopper in one of declarer's two threat suits. The simple squeeze takes place against one opponent only and gains one trick only.