enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Transferred intent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transferred_intent

    In United States criminal law, transferred intent is sometimes explained by stating that "the intent follows the bullet". [ citation needed ] That is, the intent to kill a person by gunshot would still apply even if the bullet kills an unintended victim ( see mens rea ).

  3. Mens rea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea

    In criminal law, mens rea (/ ˈ m ɛ n z ˈ r eɪ ə /; Law Latin for "guilty mind" [1]) is the mental state of a defendant who is accused of committing a crime. In common law jurisdictions, most crimes require proof both of mens rea and actus reus ("guilty act") before the defendant can be found guilty.

  4. Strict liability (criminal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability_(criminal)

    In criminal law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea (Law Latin for "guilty mind") does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus ("guilty act") although intention, recklessness or knowledge may be required in relation to other elements of the offense (Preterintentionally [1] [2] /ultraintentional [3] /versari in re illicita).

  5. R v Woollin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Woollin

    Woollin's murder conviction was quashed (but not so in the Court of Appeal); leave having been given by the House not the lower court, as the jury instructions were there had to be "substantial risk" of death or grievous bodily harm, which was held to be far wider in scope than virtual certainty; and the actions duly considered in the round on the facts stated as proven by the jury fell short ...

  6. Criminal negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence

    In criminal law, criminal negligence is an offence that involves a breach of an objective standard of behaviour expected of a defendant. It may be contrasted with strictly liable offences, which do not consider states of mind in determining criminal liability, or offenses that requires mens rea, a mental state of guilt. [1]

  7. R v Nedrick - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Nedrick

    R v Nedrick [1986] EWCA Crim 2 is an English criminal law case dealing with mens rea in murder. The case is a cornerstone as it sets down the "virtual certainty test". It applies wherever a form of indirect (oblique) intention is apparent and the charge is one of murder, or other very specific intent.

  8. Intention (criminal law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)

    A range of words represents shades of intent in criminal laws around the world. The mental element, or mens rea, of murder, for example, was historically called malice aforethought. In some jurisdictions transferred intent allows the prosecution for intentional murder if a death occurs in the course of committing an intentional felony. The ...

  9. English criminal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_criminal_law

    Mens rea is another Latin phrase, meaning "guilty mind". It is the mental element of committing a crime and establishes the element of intent. Together with an actus reus, mens rea forms the bedrock of criminal law, although strict liability offenses have encroached on this notion.