enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Communications Workers of America v. Beck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Workers_of...

    Communications Workers of America v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that, in a union security agreement, unions are authorized by statute to collect from non-members only those fees and dues necessary to perform its duties as a collective bargaining representative. [1]

  3. Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N.A. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ransom_v._FIA_Card...

    Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A., 562 U.S. 61 (2011), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the means test in Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

  4. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquette_National_Bank_of...

    On November 1, 1974, the Iowa attorney general, Richard C. Turner, filed a petition with the District Court, requesting a permanent injunction enjoining the Omaha bank and a Des Moines bank from assessing or collecting a finance charge in excess of the amount permitted by the Iowa Consumer Credit Code. The court ruled in favor of the defendants.

  5. FAQ about bank safety and deposit insurance - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/faq-bank-safety-deposit...

    The FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 includes principal and interest. If you deposit $250,000, and it earns $4,000 in interest, you are insured for only $250,000 if your bank fails.

  6. INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INDOPCO,_Inc._v._Commissioner

    To simplify application, Treasury Regulation 1.263-4(f)(1) enacts a “12-month rule” allowing the taxpayer a current deduction for amounts paid to create rights or benefits that last beyond one year of the taxpayer realizing the right or benefit if that benefit doesn’t last beyond the taxable year following the tax year the initial payment ...

  7. Supreme Court 'swipe fees' ruling may open US regulations to ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-swipe-fees-ruling...

    The 6-3 decision reversed a lower court's dismissal of the 2021 lawsuit by the Corner Post, located in Watford City, challenging the 2011 rule governing the amount businesses pay banks when ...

  8. No-penalty CD vs. savings account: Which is the best choice ...

    www.aol.com/finance/no-penalty-cd-vs-savings...

    Yes, both no-penalty CDs and savings accounts are federally insured up to the legal maximum of $250,000 per depositor, per institution — and more for some digital banks.

  9. Helvering v. Davis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helvering_v._Davis

    Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that held that Social Security was constitutionally permissible as an exercise of the federal power to spend for the general welfare and so did not contravene the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.