Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
One way of thinking holds that the mental process of decision-making is (or should be) rational: a formal process based on optimizing utility. [1] Rational thinking and decision-making does not leave much room for strong emotions. [2] In fact, emotions are often considered irrational occurrences that may distort reasoning. [3]
He or she might make different decisions based on the same set of facts and might thus make an illogical decision. Overall, the affect heuristic is of influence in nearly every decision-making arena. Overall, the affect heuristic is of influence in nearly every decision-making arena.
People's conception of who they are, can be shaped by the memories of the choices they make; the college favored over the one renounced, the job chosen over the one rejected, the candidate elected instead of another one not selected. [19] Memories of chosen as well as forgone alternatives can affect one's sense of well-being.
Markwica suggests that political and social scientists have generally employed two main action models to explain human decision-making: On the one hand, rational choice theory (also referred to as the "logic of consequences") views people as homo economicus and assumes that they make decisions to maximize benefit and to minimize cost.
Although people use intuitive and deliberative decision-making modes interchangeably, individuals value the decisions they make more when they are allowed to make them using their preferred style. [2] This specific kind of regulatory fit is referred to as decisional fit. The emotions people experience after a decision is made tend to be more ...
They can limit the ability of a player to make demands or get its own way through bluffing, bullying, instilling fear, causing apprehension, or psychologically manipulation or sending a heeded warning — and therefore can increase the likelihood that an opposing party may engage in objectionable or unwelcome behavior.
Before Christmas, he suggested Canada should become the 51st of the United States; called the Panama Canal a “vital national asset” and said that unless fees for its use were lowered he would ...
The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't is a 2021 non-fiction book by Julia Galef.. In the book, Galef argues for what she calls a scout mindset: "the motivation to see things as they are, not as you wish they were". [3]