Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wickman alleged that Schuler AG wrongfully terminated their contract for Wickman to visit car makers to market Schuler's panel presses, as their sole representative for four-and-a-half years, even though Wickman had failed to make visits. Clause 7(b) said, ‘It shall be a condition of this agreement that [Wickman] shall send its ...
Case opinions Lord Denning MR , Edmund Davies LJ and Megaw LJ Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH or The Mihalis Angelos [1970] EWCA Civ 4 is an English contract law case, concerning breach of contract.
Pages in category "Lord Wilberforce cases" The following 16 pages are in this category, out of 16 total. ... L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd; M.
Rainy Sky SA and others v Kookmin Bank [1] is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts.The Supreme Court confirmed the principle laid down in Wickman v Schuler that, if the words of a contract have ambiguous meanings, the court will interpret it in a manner that most accords with "business common sense".
Canada (AG) v Ontario (AG) [1937] UKPC 6, [1937] A.C. 326, also known as the Labour Conventions Reference, is a landmark decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council concerning the distinct nature of federal and provincial jurisdiction in Canadian federalism.
Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 is an important English contract law and company law case. In the field of contracts it is well known for MacKinnon LJ 's decision in the Court of Appeal, where he put forth the " officious bystander " formulation for determining what terms should be implied into agreements by the courts.
The case is a seminal judicial interpretation of article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In the same ruling, the Court established the so-called rule of reason , allowing non-discriminatory restrictive measures to be justified on grounds other than those listed in article 36 TFEU.
The case went to the Federal Circuit on an interlocutory appeal of the denial of summary judgment. The only issue on appeal from the district court was whether seeds and plants grown from seeds of sexually reproduced plants are patentable subject matter within the scope of 35 U.S.C. § 101—i.e., are patent eligible. [ 11 ]