Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Inclusion on the list doesn't automatically mean the absolute truth is on these websites, so always be critical and compare information between different sources. The content of the subsections is alphabetically organized. Please add free online sources if you know some that are missing in this list, but try to keep it relevant and trustworthy.
To help find sources, Wikipedians have developed a number of source-finding templates which link to searches most likely to find references suitable for use in articles. The most well-known of these is {{ find sources }} , an inline template which can be used almost anywhere.
Articles found using these links and may provide you with information to expand your search. Use Internet Archive scholar, CORE or another open-access search engine to look for an open version of the article. Using either the DOI, Google Scholar, or the journal's website, find out what databases index the article in full text.
Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people.
It's probably best to be skeptical about other markers. Matters unrelated to their writing such as sex scandals might or might not indicate anything. Awards and accolades might matter some, depending on the source, but it's probably best to avoid giving much importance to man-of-the-year type logrolling.
Here are links to some sources of information about Advanced source searching. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles or to systematic reviews ) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine .
However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject. Common sources of bias include political, financial, religious, philosophical, or other beliefs.
Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...