Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Binary search Visualization of the binary search algorithm where 7 is the target value Class Search algorithm Data structure Array Worst-case performance O (log n) Best-case performance O (1) Average performance O (log n) Worst-case space complexity O (1) Optimal Yes In computer science, binary search, also known as half-interval search, logarithmic search, or binary chop, is a search ...
lower_bound: lower_bound: lower_bound: lower_bound: Returns an iterator to the first element with a key not less than the given value. upper_bound: upper_bound: upper_bound: upper_bound: Returns an iterator to the first element with a key greater than a certain value. Observers key_comp: key_comp: key_comp: key_comp: Returns the key comparison ...
For 8-bit integers the table of quarter squares will have 2 9 −1=511 entries (one entry for the full range 0..510 of possible sums, the differences using only the first 256 entries in range 0..255) or 2 9 −1=511 entries (using for negative differences the technique of 2-complements and 9-bit masking, which avoids testing the sign of ...
In the theory of optimal binary search trees, the interleave lower bound is a lower bound on the number of operations required by a Binary Search Tree (BST) to execute a given sequence of accesses. Several variants of this lower bound have been proven. [1] [2] [3] This article is based on a variation of the first Wilber's bound. [4]
The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 3: Sorting and Searching, Third Edition. Addison–Wesley, 1997. ISBN 0-201-89685-0. Pages 138–141 of Section 5.2.3: Sorting by Selection. Anany Levitin. Introduction to the Design & Analysis of Algorithms, 2nd Edition. ISBN 0-321-35828-7. Section 3.1: Selection Sort, pp 98–100. Robert Sedgewick.
If all the vertices in the domain are visited, then terminate. Else, go to step 3. The sequence of the visited vertices is the output of the algorithm. The nearest neighbour algorithm is easy to implement and executes quickly, but it can sometimes miss shorter routes which are easily noticed with human insight, due to its "greedy" nature.
The cost of the solution produced by the algorithm is within 3/2 of the optimum. To prove this, let C be the optimal traveling salesman tour. Removing an edge from C produces a spanning tree, which must have weight at least that of the minimum spanning tree, implying that w(T) ≤ w(C) - lower bound to the cost of the optimal solution.
The lower bound on worst-case running time of output-sensitive convex hull algorithms was established to be Ω(n log h) in the planar case. [1] There are several algorithms which attain this optimal time complexity. The earliest one was introduced by Kirkpatrick and Seidel in 1986 (who called it "the ultimate convex hull algorithm").