Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Sociocracy makes a distinction between consent and consensus in order to emphasize that circle decisions are not expected to produce a "consensus" in the sense of full agreement. In sociocracy, consent is defined as "no objections", and objections are based on one's ability to work toward the aims of the organization.
Sociocracy has many of the same aims as consensus and is in applied in a similar range of situations. [88] It is slightly different in that broad support for a proposal is defined as the lack of disagreement (sometimes called 'reasoned objection') rather than affirmative agreement. [ 89 ]
Sociocracy is a socialist-positivist political view created by Auguste Comte, ... feeling that it can impede individual liberty and favor consensus democracy. [154]
The inventors of sociocracy felt that having a relatively high bar to block a process -- at least relative to true consensus -- was an important part of making sociocracy a viable system. Ah, that sounds like a good reply to the criticism of political paralysis.
Consensus theory is a social theory that holds a particular political or economic system as a fair system, and that social change should take place within the social institutions provided by it. [1] Consensus theory contrasts sharply with conflict theory , which holds that social change is only achieved through conflict.
Consensus democracy [1] is the application of consensus decision-making and supermajority to the process of legislation in a democracy.It is characterized by a decision-making structure that involves and takes into account as broad a range of opinions as possible, as opposed to majoritarian democracy systems where minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. [2]
Quakers describe their practice as one of "unity", in comparison to majority, unanimity or consensus. [3] Although minor differences exist between how different Quaker organizations conduct their meetings for business, the practice has not fundamentally changed since its conception in the late-17th century, shortly after Quakerism began. [4]
She is conversant on sociocracy and holacracy and the "N Street Consensus Method", as alternatives to what she terms "consensus with unanimity". [8] [9] She was the keynote speaker at 2013 annual conference of the Swedish Ecovillage Network. [10] In 2020, she is leading online courses in sociocracy. [11]