Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Pangilinan, 486 U.S. 875 (1988) United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990) McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., 498 U.S. 479 (1991) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc., 502 U.S. 183 (1991) Immigration and Naturalization Service v.
Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's SB 1070, a state law intended to increase the powers of local law enforcement that wished to enforce federal immigration laws. The issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement.
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the Covington and Burling law firm court filed a lawsuit on behalf of two families against the federal government for separating families at the U.S.–Mexico border according to a PBS News report. [74] 2019: June 20: In June 2019, three Ninth Circuit heard the case, 17-56297 Jenny Flores v.
FIRST ON FOX: A conservative group is suing the Department of Homeland Security as part of an effort to get what it says is "maximum transparency" about the agency’s handling of criminal illegal ...
In several cases (i.e., Charlie Chaplin, Adam Habib and Conrad Gallagher), the orders of deportation and/or exclusion were later lifted. Among many changes in terminology, "removal" superseded "deportation" in 1996 following the enactment of Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). [3] [4]
The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against the state of New York and its governor, Kathy Hochul, and Attorney General Letitia James, alleging a failure to comply with federal law by ...
A judge dismissed, with prejudice, a lawsuit that sought to try and force the state of Colorado to allow sheriff's deputies to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 vote that a 2017 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) order to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program was "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedure ...