Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Recourse debt or recourse loan is a debt that is backed by both collateral from the debtor, and by personal liability of the debtor. [2] This type of debt allows the lender to collect from the debtor and the debtor's assets in the case of default, in addition to foreclosing on a particular property or asset as with a home loan or auto loan.
A non-recourse loan is a type of debt that’s secured by collateral, such as an individual’s car, house or another typically illiquid asset. Consult with a local financial advisor today. How ...
Bankruptcy – All debts discharged under a certain bankruptcy are regarded as non-taxable income. Non-recourse loans – In case of non-recourse loans, lenders repossess the property signed as collateral by the borrower as a remedy to resolve the loan repayment default. However, lenders are barred from pursuing their borrowers for the ...
(This intuitively makes sense because with recourse debt, any cancellation of the outstanding balance of the debt, after it has been satisfied to the extent of the FMV of the property given up, really is a termination of personal liability to pay that amount, unlike in a situation where the debt is nonrecourse).
[1] The availability of a deficiency judgment depends on whether the lender has a recourse or nonrecourse loan, which is largely a matter of state law. In some jurisdictions, the original loan(s) obtained to purchase property is/are non-recourse, but subsequent refinancing of a first mortgage and/or acquisition of a 2nd (3rd, etc.) are recourse ...
Category. Qualified Annuity. Non-Qualified Annuity. Investment. Pre-tax funds, often in association with IRA or other tax-deferred vehicles. After-tax funds.
When you explore qualified vs. non-qualified dividends, you will discover the differences in taxation of distinct types of dividends. Qualified Dividends qualified vs nonqualified dividends
Commissioner v. Tufts, 461 U.S. 300 (1983), was a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that when a taxpayer sells or disposes of property encumbered by a nonrecourse obligation exceeding the fair market value of the property sold, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may require him to include in the “amount realized” the outstanding amount of the obligation ...