enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquette_National_Bank_of...

    In Iowa, on August 30, 1978, the Iowa Supreme Court threw out the lower court decisions and ruled in favor of both Fisher and the attorney general. As a result, First National filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court on September 11 and hired Robert H. Bork to argue its Minnesota case before the justices.

  3. List of boundary cases of the United States Supreme Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_boundary_cases_of...

    Handly's Lessee v. Anthony, 18 U.S. (5 Wheat.) 374 (1820), was a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the proper boundary between the states of Indiana and Kentucky was the low-water mark on the western and northwestern bank of the Ohio River.

  4. More than a dozen states have passed new laws that led to ...

    www.aol.com/more-dozen-states-passed-laws...

    Geoffrey R. Stone, a University of Chicago law professor and First Amendment expert, said the case was just the latest in a half-century of Supreme Court cases dealing with the constitutional ...

  5. Baker v. Nelson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_v._Nelson

    The couple appealed the district court's decision to the Minnesota Supreme Court. The Court heard oral argument in the case on September 21, 1971. During the oral argument, while Baker and McConnell's lawyer was presenting his case, Justice Fallon Kelly turned his chair around, thus literally turning his back on the attorney. The justices did ...

  6. Legal expert on Supreme Court leak and privacy rights under ...

    www.aol.com/news/legal-expert-supreme-court-leak...

    CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson, a law professor at Loyola Law School, joined Anne-Marie Green and Vladimir Duthiers to discuss the "stunning" leak of a Supreme Court draft opinion on ...

  7. Minnesota Supreme Court considers whether it should intervene ...

    www.aol.com/minnesota-supreme-court-considers...

    The Minnesota Supreme Court heard arguments Thursday on how deeply it should intervene in a power struggle between Democrats and Republicans over who should control the state House of Representatives.

  8. Near v. Minnesota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota

    Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court under which prior restraint on publication was found to violate freedom of the press as protected under the First Amendment. This principle was applied to free speech generally in subsequent jurisprudence. [1]

  9. Minnesota Supreme Court sides with Democrats in state House ...

    www.aol.com/news/minnesota-supreme-court-sides...

    The Minnesota Supreme Court handed Democrats a major win Friday, effectively ruling that Republicans didn’t have enough members to conduct business in the Minnesota House. The state’s highest ...