Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The binary semaphore useQueue ensures that the integrity of the state of the queue itself is not compromised, for example, by two producers attempting to add items to an empty queue simultaneously, thereby corrupting its internal state. Alternatively a mutex could be used in place of the binary semaphore.
Some semaphores would allow only one thread or process in the code section. Such Semaphores are called binary semaphore and are very similar to Mutex. Here, if the value of semaphore is 1, the thread is allowed to access and if the value is 0, the access is denied. [15]
A mutex is a locking mechanism that sometimes uses the same basic implementation as the binary semaphore. However, they differ in how they are used. While a binary semaphore may be colloquially referred to as a mutex, a true mutex has a more specific use-case and definition, in that only the task that locked the mutex is supposed to unlock it ...
# The first two are mutexes (only 0 or 1 possible) Semaphore barberReady = 0 Semaphore accessWRSeats = 1 # if 1, the number of seats in the waiting room can be incremented or decremented Semaphore custReady = 0 # the number of customers currently in the waiting room, ready to be served int numberOfFreeWRSeats = N # total number of seats in the ...
The original semaphore bounded buffer solution was written in ALGOL style. The buffer can store N portions or elements. The "number of queueing portions" semaphore counts the filled locations in the buffer, the "number of empty positions" semaphore counts the empty locations in the buffer and the semaphore "buffer manipulation" works as mutex for the buffer put and get operations.
For example, a useful pair of contracts, allowing occupancy to be passed without establishing the invariant, is: wait c: precondition I modifies the state of the monitor postcondition P c signal c precondition (not empty(c) and P c) or (empty(c) and I) modifies the state of the monitor postcondition I (See Howard [4] and Buhr et al. [5] for more.)
This feature is built into some mutex implementations, for example in glibc. The Hardware Lock Elision (HLE) in x86 is a weakened but backwards-compatible version of TSE, and we can use it here for locking without losing any compatibility.
Three semaphores are used to represent the items on the table; the agent increases the appropriate semaphore to signal that an item has been placed on the table, and smokers decrement the semaphore when removing items. Also, each smoker has an associated semaphore that they use to signal to the agent that the particular smoker is done smoking ...