enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. PLEDGER -vs- JANSSEN

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    John J. Kurz, RMR-CRR, Official Court Reporter Phone 215-683-8035 Fax 215-683-8005 - BENITA PLEDGER - CROSS - 94 1 seated. 2 All right.

  3. Cross-examination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-examination

    In law, cross-examination is the interrogation of a witness by one's opponent. It is preceded by direct examination (known as examination-in-chief in Ireland, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, South Africa, India and Pakistan) and may be followed by a redirect (known as re-examination in the aforementioned countries).

  4. The Art of Cross-Examination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Cross-Examination

    The Art of Cross-Examination is a classic text for trial attorneys and law students on how to cross-examine witnesses.Written by American attorney Francis L. Wellman, the book was first published in 1903 by The Macmillan Company, and was still in print more than 100 years later.

  5. Leading question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_question

    An examiner may generally ask leading questions of a hostile witness or on cross-examination ("Will help to elicit the testimony of a witness who, due to age, incapacity, or limited intelligence, is having difficulty communicating their evidence" [3]), but not on direct examination (to "coach" the witness to provide a particular answer).

  6. 3 (Pledger v Janssen, et al.)

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    in the court of common pleas of philadelphia county first judicial district of pennsylvania civil trial division ----- in re: risperdal® litigation :

  7. highline.huffingtonpost.com

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    DanielleO'Connor,RPR,CRR215-683-8023 1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION - - - INRE: RISPERDAL®LITIGATION

  8. Defense tactics raise eyebrows in Cohen cross-examination - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/cohen-gets-breather-bruising...

    The task of the defense in cross-examination was, therefore, to so undermine Cohen’s credibility that they sowed reasonable doubt in the minds of at least one juror about the wider case.

  9. Browne v Dunn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browne_v_Dunn

    The rule has been adopted in most common law countries, including South Africa, Australia and Fiji, and it remains one of the primary rules of consideration during cross-examination. In Australia the rule in Browne v Dunn overlaps with section 46 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and Evidence Act 1995 (Cth).